Just like a person, any company needs periodic health-checks, I propose that you keep track of pulse and temperature, plus have a look at the throat.
Photo by Claus Rebler Flickr CC
Share the analysis
To cooperate means working towards a common goal, and progress can only be evaluated if it is measured. If the measures are difficult and have to be interpreted, then most of their value is lost.
We need to find a way of communicating the company's current position that can be easily understood by all, even those that have not been trained in management. One thing more, financials are not enough. There are many critics against the way we measure company performance, and they might be right, but it is the best we have - so for the time being I suggest we use a simplified structure to describe return on investment and add two more measures.
A look at the throat, get a feel for general performance
When the MD looks down your throat he looks for signs of infection or any other anomaly. It is the same thing we do when we look at a monthly financial report, we are interested in seeing if something seems out of order and if there are signs of infection. It is a kind of snapshot and does not really give any idea of progress, we don't know if the patient is getting better or worse, only if there are reasons for concern or not.
In the 1920's the Du Pont corporation developed a formula for calculating the return the investors get from the firm.
ROE = (Profit margin)*(Asset turnover)*(Equity multiplier) = (Net profit/Sales)*(Sales/Assets)*(Assets/Equity)= (Net Profit/Equity)
Operating efficiency (measured by profit margin)
Asset use efficiency (measured by asset turnover)
Financial leverage (measured by equity multiplier)
To make the measures easier to understand, Du Pont made a diagram where the numbers could be filled in and made the formula easier to digest and others have developed it further using excel (see the link).
Take the temperature to see if the machine is running well
The Du Pont formula is not enough, it is very important since a shareholder without return is a very unhappy shareholder, but still it is not enough. You need to know if all the investments done in the company is being used to its full capacity or not. The Total Quality movement defined a concept called "Overall Equipment Efficiency" which has proven to be very capable to communicate how machines are performing.
OEE = Actual output / Theoretical maximum output
OEE = Availability Ratio x Performance Ratio x Quality Ratio
What this means is that the OEE is a measure of how the process is performing in comparison to an ideal situation. Often this number is very low, it might be a bit disheartening but at the same time shows how much can be done. Improvements in OEE has a very direct impact on ROE since it makes the profit margin increase dramatically.
Check the pulse to see if the machine is running or just strolling
The winner in the game of evolution is who adapts the fastest to changing circumstances. To adapt fast you need many brains working, it is not enough with one genius and a lot of slaves - you need raw brain power, tons of it.
An adult human brain weighs about 1300-1400 grams, if you create policies and incentives that make all employees contribute your total brain capacity goes up immediately. Maybe you can't get tons of grey matter working for you, but it is worth the effort to get as much as possible.
Pulse = Number of implemented improvements per worker and year
The measure I propose for pulse is rather tough. It is not enough to have an idea, it has to be implemented to count. Toyota reportedly achieves the fantastic number of 42 implemented improvements per worker and year, the best I've ever seen is 10. Still, that company was doing very well and Toyota has managed to become the world largest car manufacturer.
So what do you think, would these three measures be enough?